pops
P
O
P
s
    Persistent Organic Pollutants

2005 POPs Conference of the Parties 1st Session (COP1)


04/13/02:
Senator Jim Jeffords introduces POPs Implementation Act of 2002
04/12/02: White House Move on Toxic-Chemicals Pact Assailed
04/12/02: Senator Bashes White House Proposal on Pollutants

 

 

ADDRESS TO THE PLENARY SESSION AT
THE FIRST CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES FOR T
HE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION ON PERSISTANT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS.
====================================

 

Shawna Larson

International Indian Treaty Council, Indigenous Environmental Network
and Alaska Community Action on Toxics

Thank you Mr. Chairman and congratulations on your recent appointment. My name is Shawna Larson and I am and Ahtna Athabaskan from Chickaloon Village which is located in southern Alaska in the United States. My Tribe is a member of the Arctic Athabaskan Council and has a permanent participant seat on the Arctic Council.

I extend my sincere gratification to the government of Uruguay for being such a gracious host and to the Swiss government as well for providing financial support to this meeting.

I would like to congratulate the drafting group that worked on the issue of DDT for navigating through a difficult subject. I would also like to acknowledge the recent decline in DDT levels in the arctic. I recognize and congratulate the countries that are making the effort to phase out and ban the use of DDT and I also recognize the excising health problems, which currently prohibit countries from immediate elimination. As you know, indigenous peoples of the north remain culturally an economically dependent on our traditional foods and the environment for survival. But we as indigenous peoples are continuing to be impacted by the decisions made on DDT. In the spirit of the Stockholm Convention, I would encourage all parties to keep in mind the current impacts of DDT to indigenous peoples and urge the support of funding mechanisms for quickly finding safe alternatives.

Secondly, I would like to address the Dioxin Toolkit. Although I realize that there are many difficulties in developing a workable toolkit, I have noted some concerns about the current state. This is relevant to indigenous peoples because the final decisions made on the strategy to reduce dioxin emissions, including the toolkit, ultimately impacts our culture and future generations. Inclusion of a source identification strategy could ensure further protection of human health and the environment. As my distant relative from the west, Sheila Watt-Cloutier mentioned today indigenous peoples serve as an indicator for toxic exposures to the world and therefore the most effective toolkit possible should be made available.

On the draft for the Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental Practices I would like to acknowledge all the work that has gone into the development. I would ask that countries work to make certain that the guidelines are set to help ensure the safety of our traditional foods.

Lastly I would like to thank those countries who have started proposing the next generation of POPs which includes chemicals such as Lindane and PBDE´s that are currently impacting indigenous peoples. I would like to encourage the support of the inclusion of traditional knowledge in the assessments done on emerging chemicals. Our traditional knowledge can add valuable information to the conventional science based process and have significant impacts on social and economic considerations.

I will close by thanking all the parties and those who intend to join this very important convention which directly determines the fate of my Ahtna Athabaskan Peoples, our children, our culture and our survival are depending on it.

Thank you

 

 

Toxic Lice Treatment Under Scrutiny
====================================

 

Raúl Pierri
http://www.ipsnews.net/africa/interna.asp?idnews=28591

PUNTA DEL ESTE, Uruguay, May 6 (IPS) - A group of experts will study the effects on human health of four toxic chemicals, including the widely used lice treatment lindane, to consider their potential inclusion on a list of products banned under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs).

The creation of this study panel was among the final decisions adopted at the 1st Conference of Parties to the Stockholm Convention, which ended Friday in the Uruguayan resort town of Punta del Este.

At the urging of environmental organisations, a number of governments and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the government delegates attending the conference resolved to set up a research committee responsible for analysing products that could be added to the list of 12 toxic pollutants, known as the - dirty dozen", already prohibited by the Convention.

Norway proposed the inclusion of pentabromodiphenyl ether (penta-BDE), a flame retardant, the European Union wants to add the pesticide chlordecone and hexabromobiphenyl (Hexa-BB), another flame retardant, while Mexico has suggested including a group of pesticides known as hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCH), which include lindane, commonly used to treat head lice and scabies.

The announcement was made at the end of the Conference by UNEP Executive Director Klaus Toepfer, who was accompanied by Uruguayan Environment Minister Mariano Arana and the acting executive secretary of the Stockholm Convention, Canadian John Buccini.

The process of analysing the four substances proposed for inclusion on the POPs blacklist will take at least three years, according to Buccini. The research group will be based in Geneva, where the Stockholm Convention international headquarters is located.

Although lindane is most frequently used on children infected with head lice, its use is already prohibited in at least 52 countries and severely restricted in another 33, activists from the International POPs Elimination Network (IPEN) told IPS.

Like the 12 POPs already banned by the Convention, this pesticide accumulates in very cold climates, like the Arctic, where low temperatures prevent it from evaporating. It has spread to the fauna in the regions of the far North and particularly affects the indigenous peoples who depend on the fatty tissues and meat of animals like whales and seals for their survival.

The activists reported that lindane can damage the nervous and immune systems, and that scientific research has linked its use to brain tumours in children.

Meanwhile, the delegates agreed to uphold the exemptions for countries that need to use the insecticide DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) to fight malaria, although they called for a search for effective, affordable alternatives, in order to gradually phase out the use of this chemical.

DDT, which is included in the "dirty dozen", is still widely used as an effective and low-cost weapon against the mosquitoes that transmit malaria, which kills more than one million people around the world every year, primarily in Africa. A total of around 300 million people contract the disease annually.

"The convention required this meeting to determine whether DDT continues to be essential to health protection and the decision was yes," said Buccini, who pointed out that the list of exemptions is reviewed every three years.

In addition, the conference called for the World Health Organisation (WHO) to cooperate in each review, and in the search for alternatives to DDT.

Toepfer noted that although there is agreement that DDT cannot be eliminated yet, a major effort is underway worldwide to come up with alternatives for combating malaria.

The Stockholm Convention, which was signed in 2001, is aimed at eliminating or reducing levels of 12 specific POPs: nine pesticides (aldrine, chlordane, DDT, dieldrine, endrine, heptachlor, hexachlorobenzene, mirex and toxaphen), two unintentional byproducts of chemical production and the burning of chlorinated substances (dioxins and furans), and a group of industrial pollutants known collectively as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).

The majority of these chemicals are organochlorines or byproducts of their production or use.

These chemicals, which are highly toxic to animals and humans, are stable and persistent, lasting for years or decades before degrading into less dangerous forms; travel widely through the air and water; and accumulate in the fatty tissue of living organisms - which means they can be passed along the food chain.

Exposure to these 12 toxins has been shown to weaken the immune system and increase the risk of cancer, hormonal imbalances, neurological disorders, infertility and diabetes.

The Convention, adopted in May 2001 in Stockholm under the auspices of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), has been signed so far by 151 countries and ratified by 97. It entered into force in May 2004.

The conference in Punta del Este drew 636 delegates from 133 countries, one-third of whom were representatives of non-governmental organisations (NGOs), who attended as observers.

Toepfer highlighted the efforts of activists, stating that IPEN and other NGOs have played a key role by focusing the attention of governments and the public on the need to eliminate these chemicals.

Governments must make their own contribution by rapidly reducing the risks posed to the environment by toxic chemicals with a long life span, he added.

Uruguayan President Tabaré Vázquez, who attended Friday's closing session, underlined the importance of tackling the world's environmental challenges, "as social problems that must be resolved at a political level."

The Convention should be conceived of as part of "a sustainable development project in which the economy is at the service of people, and people are effectively recognised as part of society and their natural environment," he added.

The 2nd Conference of the Parties will be held next year in Geneva.

 

 

Despite Int'l Agreement, DDT Will Not Disappear Overnight
====================================

 

Raul Pierri mailto:ipslatam@ipsnews.net
Inter Press Service (IPS)
http://www.oneworld.net/external/?url=http://www.ipsnews.net
07 May 2005
http://www.oneworld.net/article/view/110927/1/

 

PUNTA DEL ESTE, Uruguay, May 6 (IPS) - The signatories of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) pledged Thursday to search for alternatives in order to eventually eliminate the use of the insecticide DDT in the fight against malaria.

Although DDT is one of the 12 POPs that the international community has agreed on liminating as soon as possible, it is still widely used as an effective and low-cost weapon against the mosquitoes that transmit malaria, which kills over a million people around the world every year, primarily in Africa. Around 300 million people contract the disease annually.

The delegates to the 1st Conference of Parties to the Stockholm Convention, taking place Monday to Friday in the Uruguayan resort town of Punta del Este, agreed to ask the World Health Organisation (WHO) to draft a report on alternative methods for fighting malaria and their potential effectiveness.

They also called on the international financial institutions to support efforts to develop other strategies for combating this disease which do not necessarily involve the use of chemical products.

WHO Assistant Director-General Kerstin Leitner stressed the need to monitor the use of DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) while seeking out economically sustainable alternatives at the same time, and said that her organisation was prepared to lead the search for new options.

The Stockholm Convention, which was signed in 2001 and entered into effect in May 2004, is aimed at eliminating or reducing levels of 12 specific POPs.

This so-called "dirty dozen" comprises nine chemicals used as pesticides (aldrine, chlordane, DDT, dieldrine, endrine, heptachlor, hexachlorobenzene, mirex and toxaphen), two unintentional byproducts of chemical production and the burning of chlorinated substances (dioxins and furans), and a group of industrial pollutants known collectively as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).

These and other POPs are chemicals that remain intact in the environment for long periods, become widely distributed through the air and water, accumulate in the fatty tissue of living organisms -- and can thus be passed along the food chain -- and are highly toxic to animals and humans.

Exposure to these 12 toxins has been shown to increase the risk of cancer, hormonal imbalances, neurological disorders, infertility, diabetes and a weakened immune system.

The delegates meeting in Punta del Este resolved that the countries that have been granted an exemption allowing them to keep using DDT can continue to do so in the short term, but they stressed that it is essential to begin a "transition" towards eliminating its use completely.

Some observers attribute the devastating effects of malaria to the restrictions imposed by governments and environmentalists on the use of DDT. The controversial insecticide was patented in 1937 by Swiss chemist Paul Müller, who was awarded the 1948 Nobel Prize for Medicine.

Mexican Deputy Minister of Environmental Protection Francisco Giner de los Ríos underlined the importance of regional cooperation in developing alternative strategies for fighting malaria.

"In Mexico we have succeeded in adopting an integrated approach to preventing and combating malaria, without having to use DDT, and we have also cooperated with countries in Central America to help them do the same. We hope that this example will be followed by others," he told the conference Thursday.

Mexico was a major producer of DDT from the 1950s until the year 2000, when it completely eliminated its use. It currently implements an integrated malaria control programme that includes community participation in cleaning out gutters and other sources of water where mosquitoes can breed, as well as volunteer work to raise awareness of the disease and distribute preventive medications.

This is precisely the strategy proposed by environmentalists.

"We believe that DDT can be eliminated and malaria can be brought under control at the same time. The disease can be fought without the need for this particular pesticide," Mexican environmentalist Fernando Bejarano González of the International POPs Elimination Network (IPEN) commented to IPS.

"What is needed is an integral approach involving community participation. It is not simply a matter of replacing one chemical with another, but rather of developing a comprehensive strategy," said the activist, who is participating in the conference as an observer.

India, currently the world's largest producer of DDT, has begun to implement original, alternative methods to fight malaria, such as the use of fish that eat the larvae of the mosquitoes that spread the disease, he noted.

But Bejarano González stressed that the banning of DDT should be accompanied by large-scale public information campaigns, especially aimed at farmers.

Otherwise, "there is the risk that they will go back to using the pesticide illegally, because it is cheap, effective and can be easily smuggled in thanks to the lack of customs controls, which has been made worse by free trade agreements," he warned.

For his part, Paul Saoke of the Kenya Association of Physicians and Medical Workers for Social Responsibility told IPS that governments should seek ways of fighting this disease without the use of chemical products.

However, he added, when it is absolutely necessary, it is better to use pyrethroid pesticides, which are considered "non-persistent" chemicals (meaning that they break down easily) to fumigate homes.

The conference in Punta del Este is being attended by some 800 representatives from over 70 countries, including 50 government ministers and deputy ministers. On the last day of the meeting, a speech is scheduled to be given by Uruguayan President Tabaré Vázquez, an oncologist. In the negotiations on DDT, Togo, Botswana and Yemen asked for further exemptions, to allow them to use the pesticide against new outbreaks of malaria, while Venezuela reported that it still has small reserves of the chemical for experimental purposes.

 

 

 

UN May Add New Chemicals to 'Dirty Dozen' Ban - toxins in Lindane, Chlordecone UN May Add New Chemicals to 'Dirty Dozen' Ban
====================================

 

URUGUAY: May 9, 2005
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/30716/story.htm

 

PUNTA DEL ESTE, Uruguay - Countries at a UN meeting in Uruguay agreed on Friday to consider adding four new chemicals to the "dirty dozen" list of banned pesticides and industrial chemicals, a UN official said.

The week-long meeting that concluded on Friday also sought to reduce the legal exemptions included in the 2004 UN ban on the world's most hazardous substances blamed for deaths, cancer or birth defects in humans and animals.

But exemptions for some toxins such as DDT were maintained to allow their use to fend off deadly insects despite their harmful effects.

"We are very satisfied. The results here are not academic achievements but they are achievements for all people in the world," said Klaus Toepfer, executive director of the United Nations Environment Program, which organized the conference.

About 800 officials from around the world gathered in the Uruguayan beach resort of Punta del Este to bolster the Stockholm Convention to eliminate so-called persistent organic pollutants, or POPs.

The convention has been ratified by 98 of the 151 countries that signed it. The United States and Russia are among those nations yet to ratify the accord.

"Four chemicals have already been mentioned for further research and integration, for example lindane, a pesticide widely used around the world. These are very important chemicals," said Toepfer.

POPs build up in fatty tissues and traces can be found in every person in the world.

The candidates for being phased out include two flame retardants called pentabrominated diphenyl ether (penta-BDE) and hexabromobiphenyl (Hexa-BB).

The other two culprits are the insecticide lindane and the pesticide chlordecone.

The working group to study these four will meet in October or November. It could take up to three years before they are formally included in the ban.

Environmentalist group WWF had proposed 20 chemicals be added to the ban.

EXEMPTIONS UPHELD

The conference upheld exemptions for some toxins -- most importantly the anti-malarial DDT and termite killer mirex -- in some countries because the death and damage caused by their disuse was considered to be worse than the harm they cause. The list of exemptions is reviewed every three years.

"The convention required this meeting to determine whether DDT continues to be essential to health protection and the decision was yes," said John Buccini, acting executive secretary of the Stockholm Convention.

While DDT is banned for use on crops, about 20 countries spray some 7,500 tonnes of the chemical every year in their homes to kill mosquitoes. Malaria kills 1 million people a year.

The UN estimates termites cause $30 billion a year in damage by chomping through wooden buildings, bridges and crops.

Environmentalists were pleased with the possible widening of the ban but said the commitment from some governments was still too weak.

They say countries need to find ways of financing poor countries who adopt more costly alternatives to the hazardous chemicals.

"I'm not happy at all. What was lacking at this meeting was a greater commitment from governments and multilateral organizations to increase financing, especially to developing nations," said Clifton Curtis, director of WWF's Global Toxics Program.

Story by Patricia Avila

REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

 

U.N. to review "dirty dozen" chemicals

====================================

 

 

Last Updated: 2005-04-29 13:56:19 -0400 (Reuters Health)
http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2005/04/29/eline/links/20050429elin018..html

 

MONTEVIDEO, Uruguay (Reuters) - A U.N. meeting in Uruguay next week will review a convention banning a "dirty dozen" industrial chemicals.

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are among the most dangerous of all man-made products or wastes, causing deaths, diseases and birth defects among humans and animals. The

Stockholm Convention, which entered into force in May 2004, aims to ban or strictly control production, import, export, disposal and use of POPs. U.N. experts will meet in Punta del Este, Uruguay, from May 2 to 6 for a first review.

The 12 POPs are:

ALDRIN - A pesticide used to kill termites, grasshoppers and other insect pests. It can also kill birds, fish and humans. In one incident, aldrin-treated rice is thought to have killed hundreds of shorebirds along Texas's Gulf Coast.

CHLORDANE - Used to control termites and as a broad insecticide on a range of crops. Tests show it can kill birds and fish, may affect the human immune system and could be a carcinogen.

DDT - Perhaps the best known of the group, DDT was widely used during World War II to protect soldiers and civilians from malaria, typhus and other diseases spread by insects. About 20 nations have an opt-out to continue to use it to combat malaria. Long-term exposure has been associated with chronic ailments in humans. It also thins the shells of birds' eggs.

DIELDRIN - Used mainly to control termites and textile pests, it is highly toxic to fish and other aquatic creatures, especially frogs. In a U.S. survey, dieldrin was the second most common pesticide found in pasteurised milk.

DIOXINS - These chemicals are produced due to incomplete combustion, as well as from the manufacture of pesticides and other chlorinated substances. They are emitted mostly from the burning of hospital waste, municipal waste and hazardous waste and have been linked to a number of adverse effects in humans, including immune and enzyme disorders.

ENDRIN - An insecticide sprayed on the leaves of crops such as cotton and grains, it is also used to control mice and other rodents. It can persist in the soil for up to 12 years and find its way to water, where it is highly toxic to fish.

FURANS - Compounds created unintentionally from many of the same processes that produce dioxins, furans have been found in emissions from waste incinerators and automobiles. They are similar to dioxins and produce many of the same toxic effects.

HEPTACHLOR - Mostly used to kill soil insects and termites, it is believed to be responsible for the decline of many wild bird populations, including Canada geese and American kestrels in the Columbia River basin of the United States. High doses are also fatal to mink, rats and rabbits. It is classified as a possible human carcinogen.

HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) - Introduced in 1945 to treat weeds, it kills fungi that affect food crops. When people in eastern Turkey ate HCB-treated seed grain between 1954 and 1959, they developed a variety of symptoms including colic. Several thousand developed a metabolic disorder called porphyria turcica and 14 percent died. HCB is found in food of all types.

MIREX - An insecticide mainly used to combat fire ants that has also been used as a fire retardant in plastics, rubber and electrical goods. Direct exposure does not seem to cause injury to humans but it has been classified as a possible human carcinogen.

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) - These compounds are used in industry as heat exchange fluids, in electric transformers and as additives in paint and plastics. They are toxic to fish and have been linked to reproductive failure and immune system suppression in a number of wild animals including seals and mink. Large numbers of people have been exposed to PCBs through food contamination. Consumption of PCB-contaminated rice oil in Japan in 1968 and Taiwan in 1979 caused pigmentation of nails and fatigue, nausea and vomiting. Children born up to seven years after the Taiwan incident in infected mothers showed developmental delays and behavioural problems.

TOXAPHENE - An insecticide used on cotton, cereal grains, fruits, nuts and vegetables. It is highly toxic to fish and listed as a possible cause for cancer among humans.

Copyright © 2005 Reuters Limited

 

 

Senator Jim Jeffords introduces
POPs Implementation Act of 2002

====================================

 

 

04/13/02

Dear All,

I am pleased to announce that Senator Jim Jeffords (I-VT) today introduced the POPs Implementation Act of 2002. This piece of legislation is intended to serve as the domestic implementing authority for the Stockholm Convention, and is superior to the legislation that the Bush Administration revealed at a press conference earlier today in several ways.

While the Bush legislation -- which should be introduced by Sen. Bob Smith (R-NH) and Rep. Paul Gillmor (R-OH) in the next few days -- fails to address future POPs beyond the initial 12, the Jeffords bill remedies this defect. The Jeffords bill therefore gives EPA the authority to implement the treaty in its entirety.

 In addition, the Jeffords bill includes a number of exciting additional provisions, including:

 *A mandate that EPA contract with the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to undertake a POPs research program designed to:

-Screen chemicals using the POPs criteria outlined in the Stockholm Convention and proactively identify priority POPs for possible nomination to the POPs Review Committee under the Convention; and

-Develop a monitoring strategy for persistent and bioaccumulative substances.

 *A requirement that EPA develop and submit to Congress a comprehensive strategy to reduce the public’s exposure to persistent, bioaccumulative toxic substances; and

 *A requirement that EPA submit to Congress, within 90 days of the enactment of this legislation, its final dioxin reassessment!

 The Jeffords bill represents a major step forward in the effort to ratify and fully implement the Stockholm Convention in the U.S. Thanks and congratulations should go to Senator Jeffords and his staff for this bold step in the right direction.

 Stay tuned for further information as the situation on the Hill develops.

 

                Cheers,

                               Karen

Karen Perry
Deputy Director, Environment & Health Program
Physicians for Social Responsibility
1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 1012
Washington DC 20009
Phone (202) 667-4260 x249    Fax (202) 667-4201    http://www.psr.org

 

White House Move on Toxic-Chemicals Pact Assailed
====================================

 


By Eric Pianin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 12, 2002; Page A13


The Bush administration yesterday formally sought congressional approval of an international treaty to phase out a dozen highly toxic chemicals, but environmentalists accused officials of backtracking on a commitment to create a way to gradually add to the list of banned pollutants.

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christine Todd Whitman, in an appearance on Capitol Hill, predicted swift Senate approval of the treaty, adding that it will "safeguard people's health around the globe."

But environmental and public health advocacy groups that last year praised Bush for signing the treaty -- which governs persistent chemical pollutants -- lashed out yesterday after the administration submitted the treaty without proposing a means for adding more pollutants to the "dirty dozen" list.

"It's shameful that the Bush administration is attempting to only partially implement this important treaty to protect human health and the environment," said Jeremiah D. Baumann of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group.

Whitman and other administration officials denied they had reneged on their commitment, pledging to work with foreign officials and Congress to develop an evaluation process and criteria for banning other toxic chemicals once the Senate ratifies the treaty. "We still embrace the idea that there are going to be future chemicals that are going to be added," Whitman said.

Until now, the toxic chemical treaty was one of the few environmental issues on which the two sides could agree. For the past year and a half, Bush and environmentalists have fought over global warming and clean air policies.

Last April, shortly before Earth Day, Bush announced he would sign the treaty aimed at reducing the release of dangerous chemicals linked to cancer and birth defects -- a move widely interpreted as part of an effort to alter his image as a friend of industrial polluters.

The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants calls for the gradual elimination worldwide of several pesticides, including aldrin and DDT, and industrial chemicals, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and hexachlorobenzene (HCB). Most of those chemicals already are banned in the United States and other industrialized countries. Environmental groups that endorsed the treaty were especially heartened by a provision that called for scientific evaluation of new chemicals to be added with the consent of a majority of the 120 participating countries.

Among the chemicals that environmentalists would like to see added to the list are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are a byproduct of the burning of coal and oil, and brominated flame retardants, which are used in the electronics and plastics industry.

Yet the treaty provision addressing additional chemicals was not included in the enabling legislation drafted by the EPA that accompanied the treaty submitted to Congress yesterday. An administration interagency task force, including officials from the Office of Management and Budget, dropped the provision. They argued that the international community had not yet agreed on a specific review process and that the EPA, invoking existing law, could unilaterally impose restrictions on other toxic chemicals if it chooses.

Whitman told reporters yesterday that the administration decided to focus on obtaining Senate ratification of the international ban on the 12 listed chemicals before turning its attention to other potential candidates for banning.

"It got so complicated to find language that was comprehensive enough and yet didn't tie our hands or would be something that could be accepted by the rest of the world community," she said.

Some environmentalists and lawmakers said that by dropping the provision from the enabling legislation, the administration may have made it more difficult and cumbersome to add chemicals to the list later on.

Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman James M. Jeffords (I-Vt.) said he was "deeply disappointed" by the administration's action. He then introduced legislation that he said would "fulfill our obligations under the treaty."

© 2002 The Washington Post Company



Senator Bashes White House Proposal on Pollutants

====================================

Environment: The plan for enacting a global treaty fails to address dealing with future harmful substances.



April 12, 2002
From Associated Press
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-000026240apr12.story?coll=la%2Dnews%2Dscience


WASHINGTON -- James M. Jeffords, chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, took issue Thursday with a White House proposal to enact a treaty phasing out a dozen highly toxic chemicals without offering a means to eliminate future pollutants.

"To send up this proposal without the ability to regulate new harmful substances is shortsighted and does not fulfill our commitment to this global treaty," said Jeffords (I-Vt.), who introduced a bill that would restore such an ability.

The treaty contains a provision for dealing with future pollutants; the administration's legislation enabling Congress to enact the treaty is missing that provision. Sen. Bob Smith (R-N.H.), is sponsoring the White House effort to have the Senate ratify the Clinton-era treaty on persistent organic pollutants, or POPs, and have Congress pass legislation enabling the treaty.

"This needs to be done and be done quickly," said Smith, who was Jeffords' predecessor as chairman of the committee.

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christie Whitman signed the POPs treaty on behalf of the United States on May 23. A year after promising to ask the Senate to ratify the treaty, President Bush formally submitted his request Thursday.

The administration offered Congress no advice on how to meet the treaty's goal of adding future pollutants to the hit list.

At least one of EPA's earlier drafts, a copy of which was obtained by Associated Press, provided a mechanism for anticipating what chemicals might be added to the phase-out.

The disputed provision would allow additional chemicals to be banned only after a rigorous scientific review involving analysis by a science committee and approval by a majority of nations involved. In the administration's latest proposal, the agency and the State Department left that process out.

"It got so complicated to find language that was comprehensive enough and yet didn't tie our hands or would be something that could be accepted by the rest of the world community," Whitman said. "We still embrace the idea that there are going to be future chemicals that are going to be added."

EPA Assistant Administrator Stephen Johnson said Bush administration officials would work with Congress on the legislation, and that senior EPA staff members would meet with their counterparts from other countries in June to discuss the process for "balancing risks and benefits" of banning future chemicals.

Some said the Bush administration's shift makes it more likely that Congress will either not deal with the issue or will approve a process for including new chemicals that would require amending the enabling law.

"The Bush administration proposal ties the EPA's hands, limiting domestic implementation to 12 POPs already regulated in the U.S.," said Dr. Robert K. Musil, executive director of Physicians for Social Responsibility, an advocacy group.

Most of the pollutants among the group commonly referred to as the "dirty dozen"--PCBs, dioxins and furans, along with DDT and other pesticides--are no longer used in industrialized countries such as the United States, but many are still widely used in developing nations.

Production and use of nine of the 12 chemicals would be banned as soon as the treaty took effect, which would take at least several years.

About 25 countries would be allowed to continue to use DDT to combat malaria in accordance with World Health Organization guidelines, pending development of safer solutions.

Releases of dioxins and furans--toxic byproducts of waste burning and industrial production--would be reduced and eventually eliminated where feasible, according to the treaty.



 

 

====================================


http://www.junkscience.com/
Return to: Persistent Organic Pollutants Go to: IEN Subjec Page